Graphic Design - Research  
               
 
divider
Home
divider

Medicines information

divider
Graphic Design Education
divider
Information Design Research
divider
Results
divider
About
divider
 

Comments

Pictograms on Medicine packaging? (2022)

An analysis of the use of pictograms on the packaging of a medical device in March 2022. The main aim of this text is to question if pictograms can be seen as ‘effective visual communication’ and ‘if they are really beneficial for patients’. [Download pdf.].


Electronic Product Information(ePI) (2019)

A collaboration of EMA-HMA-EC started a public consultation on 31 January 2019. The aim is to collect comments about ‘Draft Key Principles for the development of electronic Product Information (ePI)’. Download my Response [PDF-format, about 1MB]. A summary is published on LinkedIn.


Pictograms in package inserts? (2018)

The Dutch Regulatory Authority CBG/MEB asked on April 17 2018 for feedback about a proposal to use eight pictograms to warn patients. This brief response questions this approach and suggests an alternative. (In Dutch). [download pdf]


A minor headache? The design of information about ibuprofen (2014)

At a conference, a delegate asked me: “What’s wrong with the design of the information about medicines? It is all within the current legislation, it has been approved, and it can be produced for an acceptable price.” This essay looks at one English Ibuprofen pack and comments on the contents and design of the information. [download pdf of ‘A minor headache?’]. The size is 4 MB to make sure that the photographs can be enlarged to see the details.

This study was published in Information Design Journal 22(3). pp 281-297 and as chapter 18 (pp 336 - 354) in Emmanuel Tsekleves, Rachel Cooper (Eds.): Design for Healthcare (2017).


Falsification and pharmacovigilance (2014)

The effects of visual information in recent EU-legislation is overestimated. The actual performance of ‘logos’, ‘symbols’, ‘information campaigns’, and ‘packaging design’ is substantially lower than expected. [download pdf].


Template (2008)

‘What’s wrong with the template?’ (2008) describes and analyses of 271 problems with version 7.1 of the QRD-Template. Although version 8.1 is a substantial improvement, it still has many unresolved issues that hamper the development of information about medicines that ‘really enables the users to act appropriately’. [download pdf]


Readability Guidelines (2006)

Comments about the Draft Readability Guideline in 2006. [download pdf] Many of the comments are still applicable to the 2009 Guideline.


Developing information for patients (2005)

The files ‘Enabling users or readability’ (2005) [download pdf] and ‘Achieving harmonized patient information’ (2005) [download pdf] describe the problematic relations between the QRD-template, the EU-directives, and the Readability guideline.

  Colofon